She was then given Madame Web's powers - as well as her blindness - just before Cassandra Webb died. ![]() After dealing with the kidnapping of her daughter Rachel, Julia stepped away from being a superhero, and returned decades later as Arachne in the events of Civil War. ![]() She also operated on a number of solo adventures, particularly against Death Web, a group that was also given super powers by The Commission. After operating on the corrupt government-created team Freedom Force, Julia broke ranks and became a true hero, eventually being inducted into the West Coast Avengers, the Secret Defenders, and Force Works. Sure, it could ultimately end up being a "young Cassandra Webb" movie - but it could also be a movie surrounding her successor, Julia Carpenter.Ĭreated by Jim Shooter and Mike Zeck in 1984's Secret Wars storyline, Julia was accidentally given superpowers in a secret government study held by The Commission, and began to operate as the second Spider-Woman. ![]() While we're realistically still a ways away from potentially seeing Madame Web become a reality, there is a chance that the project could be something wildly different from the story that the Internet (and even some journalists) are assuming it to be. This fact made fans not only question why 32-year-old Johnson would be cast as Madame Web, but what a Madame Web movie would even be about, with memes and copypasta quickly being made out of the character's limited role in the comics. The original version of the character, Cassandra Webb, is traditionally portrayed as a blind, superpowered elderly woman connected to a spiderweb-like life support system, who functions more as a convenient plot device for other heroes and villains than as a standalone superhero. Clarkson lined up to direct, this casting update perplexed the Internet, especially given Madame Web's unique position in the Marvel Comics sphere. ![]() While Madame Web has been rumored to be in the works in one way or another since 2019, with Jessica Jones alum S.J.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |